This episode features Dr. Lance Baumgard of Iowa State University touching on his webinar, “Rethinking Immunity in Transition Cows: Are They Truly Suppressed?” Joining the conversation are Dr. Robert Fry, Atlantic Dairy Consulting, and Dr. Ryan Pralle, Technical Services Specialist with Balchem. The panel challenges the long-standing belief that transition cows are immunosuppressed. In addition, they explore whether disease risk in early lactation is more about stressors and pathogen load than a broken immune system. In essence, the discussion centers around rethinking immunity in transition cows for better understanding and practical management.
Episode 194: Rethinking Immunity in Transition Cows: Are They Truly Suppressed
Dr. Baumgard opens by explaining the origin of the “immune suppression” theory in transition cows. Research dating back to the late 1970s showed slower neutrophil infiltration into the mammary gland in early lactation. This result led to the assumption that cows are immunosuppressed after calving. This idea has shaped industry thinking for more than 40 years. (10:43)
He outlines two primary mechanisms traditionally blamed for immune suppression. One is the cortisol surge at calving, which may impair neutrophil migration. The other is the metabolic changes of early lactation—high NEFAs, ketones, and low calcium. These appear to reduce neutrophil function in laboratory settings. (13:16)
Dr. Baumgard then challenges the central assumption. Are cows truly immunosuppressed, or are they simply exposed to greater pathogen loads and stressors during a narrow window around calving? He argues that morbidity may reflect increased environmental and physiological challenges rather than a dysfunctional immune system. (15:25)
Dr. Fry shares field data from three herds representing over 100,000 calvings. After implementing management changes—primarily building a well-designed transition barn with lower stocking density, improved hygiene, and better cow flow—metritis rates dropped from 21.3% to 9.7%. Nutrition and innate immunity remained unchanged. Therefore, the data suggest management and environment were key drivers. (21:29)
The panel discusses the role of stress stacking during the transition period. Dr. Baumgard explains that multiple simultaneous stressors, such as overcrowding, heat stress, hygiene challenges, social stress, and nutritional shifts, may overwhelm cows. He emphasizes growing evidence that stress compromises gut integrity (“leaky gut”). This situation potentially triggers systemic inflammation and increases susceptibility in tissues like the mammary gland. (27:27) Rethinking Immunity in Transition Cows can help us approach these challenges differently.
Heat stress provides another example. While mastitis rates often increase during humid Midwest summers, they decline in arid regions like Arizona and Israel despite severe heat stress. Dr. Baumgard suggests environmental pathogen load—not immune suppression—is the primary driver. Clearly, rethinking immunity in transition cows leads to new perspectives for managing health risks.
The conversation shifts to ketosis and hyperketonemia. Dr. Baumgard and Dr. Pralle discuss how elevated BHB and NEFAs may not always indicate disease but instead reflect normal metabolic adaptation to support milk production. The key distinction is productivity: cows milking well with high ketones may not require intervention. However, cows with high ketones and poor milk production warrant deeper investigation into underlying causes such as metritis, mastitis, hypocalcemia, gut inflammation, or environmental stress. (37:13)
Dr. Fry reinforces the importance of whole-cow and whole-environment evaluation rather than treating metabolic markers in isolation. Monitoring milk yield, rumination, activity, and cow demeanor—along with assessing stocking density, pen hygiene, hoof health, and stockmanship—are critical to identifying true problems. (44:00)
The group emphasizes reducing pathogen load through simple, practical management: minimizing manure accumulation, maintaining clean and dry bedding, improving calving hygiene, and lowering stocking density—especially for close-up and fresh cows. (33:39)
Looking ahead, Dr. Baumgard describes his lab’s focus on modeling “stacked stressors” to better replicate the real-world transition period. Rather than studying stressors in isolation, his team is investigating how combined stressors influence physiology, particularly gut health. (47:11) Their research will help build more advanced knowledge around Immunity in Transition Cows uses and responses.
In closing, the panel encourages industry professionals to reconsider the immune suppression paradigm. Instead of trying to “fix” the immune system at calving, the emphasis should shift toward removing stressors and minimizing environmental challenges that create excessive pathogen exposure. (53:01)
Conclusion
Please subscribe and share with your industry friends. Invite more people to join us at the Real Science Exchange virtual pub table. Don’t forget, future episodes will continue to explore new insights on Immunity in Transition Cows. Please be sure to register for our upcoming Real Science Lecture Series webinars.
Finally, if you want one of our Real Science Exchange t-shirts, screenshot your rating, review, or subscription, and email a picture to anh.marketing@balchem.com. Include your size and mailing address, and we’ll mail you a shirt.
